<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old School!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.globalbeach.com/2009/06/26/old-school/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.globalbeach.com/2009/06/26/old-school/</link>
	<description>Intelligent Interaction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 16:27:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbeach.com/2009/06/26/old-school/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbeach.com/?p=492#comment-137</guid>
		<description>I agree with Stephen that social interaction evolves and changes. Everything does. A measure of that is the tools we are using now to carry out this interaction compared to 20 years ago.

When I first arrived in Britain in 1992 the only tools available to me for contacting family back home were post and telephone. Today, my children talk to and see their Grandparents every Sunday morning via Skype and can email them their latest school work. My whole family is currently tracking and conversing with my neice via Facebook as she enjoys her post school European trip.

But all of these devices we use to interact are still only tools, no matter how successful they are.

Our job at Global Beach is to understand how to help our clients choose the appropriate tools for their business and how to measure the success of that choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Stephen that social interaction evolves and changes. Everything does. A measure of that is the tools we are using now to carry out this interaction compared to 20 years ago.</p>
<p>When I first arrived in Britain in 1992 the only tools available to me for contacting family back home were post and telephone. Today, my children talk to and see their Grandparents every Sunday morning via Skype and can email them their latest school work. My whole family is currently tracking and conversing with my neice via Facebook as she enjoys her post school European trip.</p>
<p>But all of these devices we use to interact are still only tools, no matter how successful they are.</p>
<p>Our job at Global Beach is to understand how to help our clients choose the appropriate tools for their business and how to measure the success of that choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.globalbeach.com/2009/06/26/old-school/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.globalbeach.com/?p=492#comment-133</guid>
		<description>There are no such things as &#039;tools&#039; when it comes to social interactions online. These things have no fixed definition, they change and evolve. It&#039;s not about tools at all. It&#039;s about what people do, and how they want to interact.

This is currently best illustrated by Facebook, something you astonishingly dismiss as merely &#039;putting a pretty face&#039; on long-existing social media conventions. Is that how they got over 200 million users?

They clearly understood that it&#039;s not about specific and discrete tools, but about evolving interaction and communication so that more people could and would use it. I wonder how many million FB users think forums and blogs are just for geeks, yet in some ways that&#039;s precisely what they are using.

It&#039;s the names themselves, the terms we coin that can hamstring us. The term &#039;Web 2.0&#039; irks because it implies a fixed product (which it&#039;s anything but). The same can be said about what a forum is, or a blog, or even email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no such things as &#8216;tools&#8217; when it comes to social interactions online. These things have no fixed definition, they change and evolve. It&#8217;s not about tools at all. It&#8217;s about what people do, and how they want to interact.</p>
<p>This is currently best illustrated by Facebook, something you astonishingly dismiss as merely &#8216;putting a pretty face&#8217; on long-existing social media conventions. Is that how they got over 200 million users?</p>
<p>They clearly understood that it&#8217;s not about specific and discrete tools, but about evolving interaction and communication so that more people could and would use it. I wonder how many million FB users think forums and blogs are just for geeks, yet in some ways that&#8217;s precisely what they are using.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the names themselves, the terms we coin that can hamstring us. The term &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242; irks because it implies a fixed product (which it&#8217;s anything but). The same can be said about what a forum is, or a blog, or even email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

